FP4NC, Horizontal setup

Got a little job here.
Meed to modify the bearing bores for the output axle bearings on a "Hewland" transaxle side cover.

Not a real complex job but takes some thought on the setup.
Covers are cast mag. and the outside surface is pretty much as cast.....no reference surfaces.
There are mounting bolt holes that are spot faced, but not necessarily all the same or referenced to anything else.

Here is my solution........
Setup with a vise , rotate the table 90* to get the vise orientated.(Jaws running parallel with the "Y")
Set the machine to run horizontal.
Clamp a 2-4-6 block (valuable to have 1-2-3 blocks as well as 2-4-6 blocks when running horizontal)
Use additional 2-4-6 set vertical making a make shift square.....Hold with redi-rod and nuts (1/2-13, same as the hold down tooling i use)



Some things to note: Cover is bolted through an existing part of the casting using a 1/2 " thread passes through the casting (suspension anchor point) and through the 2-4-6 block.
I adjust the vertical square of the part using a 5/16" bolt and nut between one of the cover mounting holes and the vertical 2-4-6. All held as adjusted using a "Kant-Twisr" clamp.....

Back side view of holding bolt....and vertical 2-4-6 block.....


Alignment in the "X" plane is done by rotating the table.....pretty darn nice accessory IMO


Boring setup is Sandvik "Capto" fine boring head.....some of the nicest kit i have...



Close up of the adjuster for the vertical ......


Cheers Ross

Hi Ross,

thanks for sharing this!
When I do have to machine something with a reference face on the same side as the one from which the machining will take place, I also work horizontally but I use angle plates or (2-4-6 blocks or something similar) to hold the face of the work.
Wouldn't it be more rigid here as well to clamp the reference face (left and right) on blocks or angle plates and those directly to the table?

BR,
Thanos

Likely more rigid.....but the reference area is pretty narrow, has a shoulder and its in a 9" circle, so a flat plate will only get a small section.
Chose this approach for several reasons....first off the suspension lug is solid, well ribbed to the cover, plus i had two of these to do , so the change from one to the other was quick and put the second part in almost exactly where the first was done....
This setup also made adjustment of the face to vertical quite easy (no table tilting needed to get tram) and quick (jack screw)
Finally, this was a boring job, not too much thrust involved here cutting mag.....

Cheers Ross

AlfaGTA said:

Likely more rigid.....but the reference area is pretty narrow, has a shoulder and its in a 9" circle, so a flat plate will only get a small section.
Chose this approach for several reasons....first off the suspension lug is solid, well ribbed to the cover, plus i had two of these to do , so the change from one to the other was quick and put the second part in almost exactly where the first was done....
This setup also made adjustment of the face to vertical quite easy (no table tilting needed to get tram) and quick (jack screw)
Finally, this was a boring job, not too much thrust involved here cutting mag.....

Cheers Ross

Click to expand...

Makes sense, thanks!

BR,
Thanos