xplodee
Hot Rolled
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Location
- Allentown, PA
Hey All-
We are considering the purchase of 2x Zeiss Duramax units or 2x Hexagon Tigo units. The hexagon's are coming in more expensive but have a larger working envelope. However, it seems that I need to focus most on the software because both brands are more than capable of achieving our accuracy requirements (much more than capable). We've chosen two of the shop floor style machines because throughput is most important to us, we are measuring incoming parts from our vendors prior to the parts hitting the assembly lines.
Hexagon's PC-DMIS looks terribly clunky from my point of view, and Zeiss's Calypso looks to be opposite of that. Does anyone have experience with both and could comment? We are only measuring injection molded parts, so our requirements are simple: cylindricity, total indicated runout, position, length, concentricity, flatness, diameter, that's really going to cover most of what we do and with tolerances around +/- 0.010 down to 0.0005in minimum.
We are considering the purchase of 2x Zeiss Duramax units or 2x Hexagon Tigo units. The hexagon's are coming in more expensive but have a larger working envelope. However, it seems that I need to focus most on the software because both brands are more than capable of achieving our accuracy requirements (much more than capable). We've chosen two of the shop floor style machines because throughput is most important to us, we are measuring incoming parts from our vendors prior to the parts hitting the assembly lines.
Hexagon's PC-DMIS looks terribly clunky from my point of view, and Zeiss's Calypso looks to be opposite of that. Does anyone have experience with both and could comment? We are only measuring injection molded parts, so our requirements are simple: cylindricity, total indicated runout, position, length, concentricity, flatness, diameter, that's really going to cover most of what we do and with tolerances around +/- 0.010 down to 0.0005in minimum.